<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webcasting with Django</title>
	<atom:link href="http://birdhouse.org/blog/2009/05/20/webcasting-with-django/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2009/05/20/webcasting-with-django/</link>
	<description>Like a chicken with a jewel in its beak.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:20:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2009/05/20/webcasting-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-304178</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=3315#comment-304178</guid>
		<description>Hmm... sorry that was confusing. What I mean is that one page view invokes one Django view, and since that page view includes a reference to something else in the URL patterns, a 2nd view is invoked and sent into the browser. So maybe a better way to say it would be that one page view calls two Django views in sequence without having to use signals or anything. Would that be more accurate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; sorry that was confusing. What I mean is that one page view invokes one Django view, and since that page view includes a reference to something else in the URL patterns, a 2nd view is invoked and sent into the browser. So maybe a better way to say it would be that one page view calls two Django views in sequence without having to use signals or anything. Would that be more accurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2009/05/20/webcasting-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-304177</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=3315#comment-304177</guid>
		<description>Great work!

&quot;view within a view&quot; sounds a little confusing to me, I think you are just making great use of the templating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work!</p>
<p>&#8220;view within a view&#8221; sounds a little confusing to me, I think you are just making great use of the templating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyl</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2009/05/20/webcasting-with-django/comment-page-1/#comment-304174</link>
		<dc:creator>skyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=3315#comment-304174</guid>
		<description>This is great!  I will have to read this over carefully ;)  Would be great for pinax-lms!  And I guess I can&#039;t put the link to the google group here as that would be spammy.  Cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great!  I will have to read this over carefully ;)  Would be great for pinax-lms!  And I guess I can&#8217;t put the link to the google group here as that would be spammy.  Cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
