<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes and Network Attached Storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/</link>
	<description>Like a chicken with a jewel in its beak.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:13:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289501</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 06:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289501</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t easily test those combinations, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t easily test those combinations, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mneptok</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289499</link>
		<dc:creator>mneptok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289499</guid>
		<description>Ew.

I wonder if the abstraction ickiness extends across protocols. Same behavior for NFS or CIFS/Samba?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ew.</p>
<p>I wonder if the abstraction ickiness extends across protocols. Same behavior for NFS or CIFS/Samba?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289498</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289498</guid>
		<description>Result of same experiment at work: Can&#039;t create dirs foo and Foo to an HFS+ formatted volume over AFP. Also can&#039;t create them via CLI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Result of same experiment at work: Can&#8217;t create dirs foo and Foo to an HFS+ formatted volume over AFP. Also can&#8217;t create them via CLI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289495</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289495</guid>
		<description>@mneptok: Just did a little test with an Interesting result. With an ext2 volume mounted via AFP I &lt;strong&gt;cannot&lt;/strong&gt;  create both folders &quot;Foo&quot; and &quot;foo&quot; via the Finder, but I &lt;strong&gt;can&lt;/strong&gt; create both from the shell. Both folders then appear and behave normally from the Finder. So there&#039;s definitely some weird abstraction going on -- the Finder prevents it even on a supporting filesystem, but then also respects the situation if it already exists. 

I&#039;ll try a similar experiment later today with a networked HFS+ volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mneptok: Just did a little test with an Interesting result. With an ext2 volume mounted via AFP I <strong>cannot</strong>  create both folders &#8220;Foo&#8221; and &#8220;foo&#8221; via the Finder, but I <strong>can</strong> create both from the shell. Both folders then appear and behave normally from the Finder. So there&#8217;s definitely some weird abstraction going on &#8212; the Finder prevents it even on a supporting filesystem, but then also respects the situation if it already exists. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try a similar experiment later today with a networked HFS+ volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mneptok</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289488</link>
		<dc:creator>mneptok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289488</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in how an OSX install on case-sensitive HFS+ deals with this issue. Does the kernel then automagically start handling case-sensitivity across mounts?

The fact remote shares are mounted case-insensitive by OSX is a bit daft, considering the variegated filesystem types you might expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in how an OSX install on case-sensitive HFS+ deals with this issue. Does the kernel then automagically start handling case-sensitivity across mounts?</p>
<p>The fact remote shares are mounted case-insensitive by OSX is a bit daft, considering the variegated filesystem types you might expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jer@nyquil.org</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289487</link>
		<dc:creator>jer@nyquil.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289487</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also possible to mount your ext fs with flags that make it not differentiate between case.  I don&#039;t recall what those flags are, but I had to do it a couple years back to fix a similar problem.

What&#039;s happening is that iTunes is just blindly creating dirs based on track info.  In a non-case-sensitive filesystem this isn&#039;t a problem, so if you make your filesystem not sensitive (after fixing all theirs and files, of course, the problem shouldn&#039;t occur again.

Not exactly ideal.  Another option would be to store them on   a vfat partition.  In fact, rsyncing them over to a vfat partition might just clean things up for you, come to think of it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also possible to mount your ext fs with flags that make it not differentiate between case.  I don&#8217;t recall what those flags are, but I had to do it a couple years back to fix a similar problem.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s happening is that iTunes is just blindly creating dirs based on track info.  In a non-case-sensitive filesystem this isn&#8217;t a problem, so if you make your filesystem not sensitive (after fixing all theirs and files, of course, the problem shouldn&#8217;t occur again.</p>
<p>Not exactly ideal.  Another option would be to store them on   a vfat partition.  In fact, rsyncing them over to a vfat partition might just clean things up for you, come to think of it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289486</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289486</guid>
		<description>mnep, I like it. Another good suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mnep, I like it. Another good suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mneptok</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289485</link>
		<dc:creator>mneptok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289485</guid>
		<description>IMO, the correct solution is to mount the remote share, then:

ln -s /path/to/remote/music ~/Music/iTunes/iTunes\ Music

This symlinks the directory iTunes auto-creates in &quot;panic mode&quot; to your actual remote music library location.

HTH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, the correct solution is to mount the remote share, then:</p>
<p>ln -s /path/to/remote/music ~/Music/iTunes/iTunes\ Music</p>
<p>This symlinks the directory iTunes auto-creates in &#8220;panic mode&#8221; to your actual remote music library location.</p>
<p>HTH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shacker</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289484</link>
		<dc:creator>shacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289484</guid>
		<description>Hrm, cool idea PJ. I know there was some talk of using sparseimage as a way to use Time Machine against a non-Apple NAS - can&#039;t think of a reason why it wouldn&#039;t work for this purpose too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm, cool idea PJ. I know there was some talk of using sparseimage as a way to use Time Machine against a non-Apple NAS &#8211; can&#8217;t think of a reason why it wouldn&#8217;t work for this purpose too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H.</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289482</link>
		<dc:creator>David H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289482</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...maybe I&#039;m glad I manage my music collection &amp; the loading &amp; unloading of tracks onto various iPods with &lt;a href=&quot;http://amarok.kde.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amarok&lt;/a&gt; under Linux ;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxmint.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Linux Mint&lt;/a&gt; to be exact - an Ubuntu derivative with a lovely &amp; well thought out interface...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;maybe I&#8217;m glad I manage my music collection &amp; the loading &amp; unloading of tracks onto various iPods with <a href="http://amarok.kde.org/" rel="nofollow">Amarok</a> under Linux ;) <a href="http://www.linuxmint.com/" rel="nofollow">Linux Mint</a> to be exact &#8211; an Ubuntu derivative with a lovely &amp; well thought out interface&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Doland</title>
		<link>http://birdhouse.org/blog/2008/05/07/itunes-and-network-attached-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-289480</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdhouse.org/blog/?p=2916#comment-289480</guid>
		<description>Have you thought about creating a .dmg file on the NAS, putting your music on that, then mounting it automatically at boot?

If you make it a sparse image, it should be able to grow with your collection. You&#039;ll also be able to set the volume format to:

Mac OSX Entended (Journaled)

I don&#039;t know if this will solve your problem, but it might be worth a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you thought about creating a .dmg file on the NAS, putting your music on that, then mounting it automatically at boot?</p>
<p>If you make it a sparse image, it should be able to grow with your collection. You&#8217;ll also be able to set the volume format to:</p>
<p>Mac OSX Entended (Journaled)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if this will solve your problem, but it might be worth a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
